Well, they are finally out, and they are news:
http://www.cbc.ca/story/business/nation
So what does this mean?
This means that, despite dropping big amounts for increased health care transfers to the provinces plus all other goodies from past budgets which are coming due this year, the stream of tax revenues is *still* outstripping the stream of expenses for the federal government.
At this point, I must admit that the Conservatives' policy of tax cuts is looking a bit better, but will someone *please* recognize that this is the IDEAL time to pay down large amounts of the debt of about $500 billion that was racked up from about 1960 through 1995? Cripes.....
The offical statement from the Department of Finance can be found at:
http://www.fin.gc.ca/FISCMON/2005-04e.h
August 6 2005, 16:43:29 UTC 6 years ago
August 6 2005, 18:46:41 UTC 6 years ago
Though it also does mean one other thing: All the bleating that the Tories were making about the latest budget (the extra $4.5 billion or so that the NDP demanded for the Liberals to stay in power) *surely* pushing the government into deficit were just complete and total hogwash....
August 6 2005, 19:00:01 UTC 6 years ago
Also, personally I'd rather have that money be spent on other things (such as repaying our debt) rather than some of the things it was spent on.
August 6 2005, 19:33:27 UTC 6 years ago
But the Tories weren't *just* saying that the money could be better spent on other things (and I think the mantra of tax cuts came out)...I'm pretty sure the D-word was used....let's see here...
August 6 2005, 21:58:11 UTC 6 years ago
What bugs me most is the EI surplus. We could pay off about 10% of our debt if we properly balanced the EI cash flow and flushed the stockpile. When/if we need that money back in EI, that's an acceptable excuse for a deficit budget.
While it's a good thing to have separate bank accounts for some things in one's life, at some point, it just gets silly.
August 7 2005, 00:01:08 UTC 6 years ago
- the gross debt less the assets of the government
(and is equivalent to)
- the summation of all previous deficits and surpluses
(which implicitly include interest costs within them)
Look at the bar chart in the original Finance Department link to see that it's (about) $500 billion.
As for the EI "surplus", it's a fiction. The EI surplus does not really exists, as the government MUST account for EI premiums as current revenue and EI payments as current expenses. What the EI surplus does show is the number of excess dollars that EI takes in veresus what it sends out. Effectively it's extra taxes these days, since EI *easily* takes in more then it needs to pay out.
But payroll taxes are relatively efficient forms of tax, so the government tries to maintain it as much as it can.....
August 7 2005, 05:03:58 UTC 6 years ago
I wish the gubmint would take better advantage of that system to encourage good social behaviour -- but I guess that would just make it much harder to implement.
I can (and do) already write off:
- Retirement savings
- Home purchase savings
- Educational savings and expenses
- Legal expenses related to employment
- Moving expenses
I'd like to see the gubmint roll up RRSPs and RESPs with CHBP and let me make larger contributions that could also be used:
- During a sabattical
- While caring for a child or infirm/elderly relative
- For child care
- To invest in a small business that creates jobs or to assist in becoming self-employed
On the subject of small business (to go off on another tangent), it really burns me up that maritime provinces are subsidizing the creation of really bad jobs with my dax dollars.